The Restoration of White Self-Belief
The debate between high-profile nationalists about resurrecting National Socialism has brought important questions and ideas to the fore.
For anyone not aware, over the last couple of weeks there has been a back-and-forth online, mostly between White nationalists
and , respectively from Australia and Ireland, concerning the resurrection of German National Socialism. Joel is for it, Keith is against it, and other nationalists like have chipped in with their thoughts.These debates have brought up some interesting and important questions around nationalism. My personal opinion is that restoring German National Socialism is not a winning strategy. While I agree with many of its core principles, as I’m sure many of us do, I don’t see why an ideology and political movement born of a specific historical and geopolitical context should be revived in order to advance White nationalism today. Indeed, it seems pretty clear to me that it would be more counterproductive than helpful.
I thought Keith’s latest piece on the matter laid the arguments out perfectly - in fact, I felt his previous piece had already done so and in my opinion, Joel hadn’t really succeeded in rebutting the arguments. Nativist’s take, coming down like Keith against the resurrection of National Socialism, is also well worth a read, delving a little more into history, philosophy and theology.
Yesterday I watched this live stream debate between British nationalist Mark Collett and Joel Davis on the subject. It was a vigorous discussion and turned out to be very engaging. Surprisingly, Collett didn’t seem to use many of the more rational arguments against National Socialism revival, as Woods did. Instead, his contentions with Joel Davis’ outlook appeared to revolve more around the necessity of co-operating with non-white groups, which Davis rules out, and apparently emotive appeals to recognise the suffering of other oppressed peoples such as the Palestinians. Whilst I greatly admire Mark Collett and generally agree with him, as the discussion went on I found myself increasingly in the Joel Davis camp. I find Joel far more compelling in live discussion than in writing, and as he responded to Collett’s arguments, much of what he was saying resonated strongly.
Where exactly will this ‘co-operation’ with outgroups get us? Have we not done enough of this already? Have Whites done anything but attempt to engage with, accommodate and appease foreign people for decades? Where has it brought us? Why should we not rely our ourselves alone? We need to believe in us, and only us.
I agreed with it all. What Davis advocates for is exactly what I’ve always felt we need; a ruthlessly unapologetic form of White nationalism. Appeasement has got us nowhere; moderation has got us nowhere. The century-old, largely Jewish-led attack not only on our demographics and culture, but on our morale, on our very spirit, has been relentless. We succumbed to this in the West, which is why we’ve been on the back foot for decades.
We don’t need any more evidence mass immigration harms us. We don’t need any more proof that the mass presence of non-whites in our countries is detrimental to us. We don’t need to prove that our enemies - which, to avoid accusations of vagueness, comprise the majority of the political, media and judicial establishment across the West who have presided over our dispossession, along with their immigrant client groups - hate us. We know it all, and as Davis says, we’ve won the f*cking argument. So where is left to go?
Watching this, I came to understand the logic driving his arguments in favour of National Socialism. We have been utterly failed by liberalism, modernism, individualism and democracy. What’s needed is an aggressively assertive form of self-determination as a people - not an alternative to liberalism, but its very antithesis; the inculcation in our people of indomitable will, elevation of strength over weakness, a Nietzschean Will to Power, with a unshakeable pride and confidence deriving from our blood and heritage. This is, of course, incompatible with liberalism or any ideology that supports ideas of universal equality, suffrage and the absence of natural order and hierarchy. The late great Jonathan Bowden spoke often on these topics.
This is why the battle for White survival is, above all, a spiritual one. This will to power, this spirit of self-affirmation described above, has been beaten out of us over a extended period of time. This is how a people who once ruled all corners of the earth have been reduced to what we see now - a race completely unique in advocating for the elevation of outgroups above itself; a people so mired in shame and guilt that it continues to elect leaders who spit in their faces by flooding their towns and cities with the scum of the third world, transforming once high-trust, wholesome societies into dangerous, dystopian hellholes.
I also believe that were even a tenth of our people to rediscover this self-belief - to shed every last vestige of liberal poison from their consciousnesses and arise in a spirit of ruthless and unapologetic self-determination, we would be unstoppable.
None of this changes my view on the National Socialism issue. It’s understandable how Joel arrived there, as National Socialism did indeed embody many of the values described above. Yet, the leap from rediscovering these values, self-affirmation and pride in our people, to resurrecting German National Socialism itself, makes little sense. We simply don’t need the brand.
Davis’ argument seems to be that unless we crush the spectre of eternal comparison to ‘Nazis’ and Hitler by rehabilitating them, we cannot move forward. I disagree with this. Firstly, being called Nazis, Hitler and so on is no different being called racist. We simply step over it. Secondly, the resurrection of this self-determination needs no justification. Davis himself said we have already won the arguments. We have reason, truth and justice on our side, and we know this. It’s simply a matter of deciding not to be sorry any more. Thirdly, this self-affirmation, once rediscovered, will in itself obviate any need to resurrect an old brand to justify its existence. True self-belief does not make excuses for itself.
The White Awakening I wrote of previously - a mass arousal of White consciousness, following decades of slumber and blindness to our circumstances - is the first step. With the significant rightward shift of the Overton Window in recent years, it does appear this awakening is underway. I believe this is laying the groundwork for the phase which must inevitably follow - unapologetic self-determination diametrically opposed to victimhood.
Rapidly changing demographics along with our corrupt political system may mean we’ll never vote our way to where we need to be. And yet, imagine what even a small tranche of our people could achieve with true self-belief, coupled with anything approaching the militancy and ruthlessness of the modern left, who have demonised us and laid waste to our civilisations for years with impunity.
These discussions have been excellent, and whilst they’ve been very valuable in bringing up crucial issues, I sincerely hope they do not become divisive. Keith, Joel and Nativist, all of whom I’ve met in person, are highly intelligent, capable and excellent advocates for our people, fighting the good fight every day. As European history has sadly shown us, the most sophisticated civilisations and movements are capable of tearing each other apart in internecine warfare driven by rivalry and often ego, which again brings us back round to National Socialism.
German National Socialism was born of a unique set of circumstances, but ultimately it was a manifestation of a continuation of longstanding intra-European enmity. This, fundamentally, must be left behind for good, as must all the online nonsense fostering discord between Whites, whether East European versus Western European, Northern European versus Southern European, European versus American, American versus Canadian and so on. We are in different times now. We all face the same threat, and that threat does not originate from native European people. As nationalists, as advocates for all Europeans, as advocates for White people worldwide, we must stand united.
This is a good essay.
White racial confidence for the majority of Whites is going to come from positive interactions with the White Vanguard.
The White Vanguard ought to already have all the 'self-belief' necessary to act in the world as a positive change agent.
But for there to be a *movement*, a large number of 'concerned' - but not yet committed - Whites need to trust 'the movement'.
Why should they trust a movement that cannot decide on fundamental questions regarding the use of power?
The internecine squabbling over NSDAPery within White Nationalism is an indication that what we have right now is not a 'movement' in any conceivable way, but, rather a *conversation*.
This isn't a bad thing. Or a good thing. It's simply where things stand right now.
The White Vanguard - people like you and I who have decided that the survival and thriving of the White race is the priority - need to understand our current situation with clarity, not regret or frustration. Instead, we should act in a manner that takes advantage of the situation.
The NSDAPers want everyone in the pro-White movement to accept their leadeship.
That's being resisted.
Rather than lament the fact that we cannot 'get our act together', it might be more productive to recognize that 'the act' we're actually a part of *is* 'together'. We're in the conversation/consciousness-raising part of the process of collective White self-actualization, not the 'organization' phase of that process.
I say, take pleasure (and even hope) in the fact that we're *having* a conversation that many voices can take part in. These moments of 'squabbling' and dissension are part of the healing process. Nothing could be more disastrous than premature 'organization' before our race is ready to commit to White collective assertion.
As I've said many times, in my view the essence of 'White Nationalism' - of pro-White advocacy - is 'Whites caring about Whites because they are White *and no other reason*'.
The NSDAPers still care more about whether you're a NSDAP-enjoyer than whether you're White and need care and concern.
The problem is that the Nazis have been the ones pressing the ticket. They spurned the creation of the alt right and led the meme war. They spurned the creation of active clubs more than any other group. From their camp rose folkism, which has spread out from NS and German stuff to other groups.
I really don't think you guys even fully understand what Joel is saying. It's not like he wants to resurrect and give every White nation German National Socialism. It seems that his idea is that each group takes the core values of NS for themselves. This view is at least expressed by Thomas Sewell.